LaBrie Found Guilty of Attempted Murder

***Judge Richard Welch sentences Kristin Labrie***

Kristin LaBrie Sentenced to 8 – 10 years on April 15, 2011 by Judge Richard Welch. She will be separated from her remaining son for the duration of his youth and longer.  This is not justice.

Kristen A. LaBrie was found guilty on all counts — attempted murder, permitting serious bodily injury to a disabled person, permitting substantial injury to a child and reckless endangerment of a child, said Steve O’Connell, spokesman for the Essex District Attorney’s Office. The Lawrence Massachusetts jury agreed with the Assistant DA’s argument that withholding chemotherapy medications from her autistic son who had non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma caused her son to die of leukemia in 2009.  The defense attorney admitted that LaBrie knowingly withheld her son’s medications, but said she did so only because of their painful side effects.

On the stand in her own defense 38 year old Kristin LaBrie testified that her son Jeremy was diagnosed with autism at age two.  ”We definitely had autism plus something they called pervasive developmental delay.”  With one hand resting on the judge’s bench, the other gesturing she said, “The care was constant. Whatever went in for a feeding came out, projectile. It was formula after formula after formula for a while.”

LaBrie told the jury that she followed the instructions from her son’s doctors for the first four phases of treatment but stopped giving her son the medications during the final phase because she “didn’t want to make him any sicker.”

Lawyers batted the fact around that she had been treated for depression with Celexa and saw a social worker.

Dr. Frederic Krell, a psychologist called by defense lawyer Kevin James, testified that LaBrie, 38, was a “depressed person who was overwhelmed with having to cope with a significantly impaired child who now had a life-threatening illness.”

“She was largely alone, psychologically, and she had a history of difficulty asking for help and getting services, and as far as I know was struggling to keep her son in school,” Krell continued.

But prosecutor Kate MacDougall — who had only just been given Krell’s final report yesterday morning by the defense — questioned the basis for those conclusions, getting Krell to admit that LaBrie didn’t fit the legal definition of mentally ill.

Kevin James, the defense attorney, said his client made a mistake, but that it was not a criminal act, arguing she never had the malice or willful intent to cause harm to her child.

“Ms. LaBrie was unable to put chemotherapy medication into her son’s body. Her coping and ability to do what she had to do started to wane. The Commonwealth wants to take this tragic set of circumstances and turn it into a criminal prosecution.’’

What no one seems to accept is the government (the entire USA and each of the 50 states) has stepped over the line. They are turning decisions parents make about their children’s medical care into criminal acts and limiting their choices in the name of looking out for those who cannot care for themselves. It is time to change the law. As an adult we are allowed to decide for ourselves when enough is enough, or to refuse certain medications. But children, nor their parents are allowed this basic right.

 

 

 

 

Grieving Mother Accused of Attempted Murder

In Massachusetts the trial started yesterday, April 5, 2011 for Kristin LaBrie, the mother who is charged with attempted murder and endangerment of her autistic son by withholding medication for non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.  In October 2006, Jeremy Fraser was diagnosed with treatable cancer. Doctors gave him an 85 percent to 90 percent chance of recovery, according to Assistant District Attorney Kate B. MacDougall. The boy was given large doses of chemotherapy in the hospital and his cancer went into remission.

The cure rate for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma is high but there is a risk of developing secondary malignancies.  Information collected about long-term survivors provides insight into the causes of second cancers. Patients with non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma are usually treated with combination chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy.

Defense attorney Kevin James said LaBrie became exhausted and upset because the medication’s side effects made Jeremy sick. I feel it is a gross miscarriage of justice to be prosecuting this grieving mother for attempted murder because she allegedly withheld the very medications that more than likely were the actual agents for the secondary cancer – the real cause of death.  The long-term effects of chemotherapy on health include many kinds of complications. The most common is infertility. If you are young and have not yet had children your doctor will try to choose the drugs that are least likely to cause infertility. Other long term effects are much less common, but include heart disease, damage to the lungs and the or secondary malignancies in the future. In addition to treating cancer, chemotherapy drugs and radiation therapy are also carcinogenic, which means they can cause cancer. Other causes for pediatric secondary primary cancers include genetic disorders

Jeremy Fraser died in March 2009 at age nine of Leukemia.  At that time he was in custody of his father, Eric Fraser who passed away shortly after his son’s death due to a motorcycle accident. Leukemia is another kind of cancer that prosecutors say was caused because the mother didn’t give the maintenance chemotherapy for his non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.

After reviewing only news articles – not medical charts, or other evidence, it is my nursing / medical-legal consultant opinion that this mother did not attempt to murder her son. Of special note, no mention of referrals to support groups for this overburdened mother was made. Neither was there any reference to recommendation of counseling to help her deal with her special needs child, who also had cancer.

Margaret L. Turley RN

4/7/11 Correction of Error above:

What’s the difference between Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma?

Answer

from Ruben A. Mesa, M.D.

Both Hodgkin lymphoma (formerly known as Hodgkin’s disease) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (also known as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma) are lymphomas, a type of cancer that originates in a subset of white blood cells called lymphocytes. Lymphocytes are an important part of your immune system. The main difference between Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma is in the specific lymphocyte each involves.

A doctor can tell the difference between Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma by examining the cancer cells under a microscope. If in examining the cells, the doctor detects the presence of a specific type of abnormal cell called a Reed-Sternberg cell, the lymphoma is classified as Hodgkin. If the Reed-Sternberg cell is not present, the lymphoma is classified as non-Hodgkin.

The distinction is important because the treatment for each type can be very different.

During research on secondary cancers the older term Hodgkin’s disease was used in the article and I transposed that error into my article. Please accept my apologies for this unintentional error.